The theory of your comparison/contrast paper is vital: it can assist you with making an engaged contention and give your peruser a guide so she/he doesn't lose all sense of direction in the ocean of focuses you are going to make. As in any paper, you will need to supplant ambiguous reports of your overall theme (for instance, "This paper will investigate two pizza places," or "Pepper's and Amante are comparable somely and diverse in others," or "Pepper's and Amante are comparative from multiple points of view, however, they have one significant contrast") with something more nitty-gritty and explicit. For instance, you may say, "Pepper's and Amante have comparable costs and fixings, however, their climates and ability to convey put them aside."
Be cautious, however—albeit this proposition is genuinely explicit and proposes a straightforward contention (that air and conveyance make the two pizza places unique), your teacher will frequently be searching for a smidgen more investigation. For this situation, the undeniable inquiry is "So what? For what reason would it be a good idea for anyone to mind that Pepper's and Amante are distinctive along these lines?" One may likewise ask why the author picked those two specific pizza spots to look at—why not Papa John's, Dominos, or Pizza Hut? Once more, considering the setting the class gives may help you answer such inquiries and make a more grounded contention. Here's an amendment of the postulation referenced before:
Pepper's and Amante both offer a more prominent assortment of fixings than other Chapel Hill/Carrboro pizza places (and than any of the popular stores), however, the astounding, enthusiastic air at Pepper's makes it a superior spot to give visiting loved ones a sample of nearby culture.